The Commencement
Bay Natural Resource Trustees made available the Hylebos
Waterway Natural Resource Damage Settlement Proposal Report
(Report) and its appendices for public review and comment
from April 17, 2002 until June 17, 2002. The Trustees
prepared a Reviewers Guide and various fact sheets to
further aid reviewers in distilling the allocation elements
of the Report. Public meetings were held on May 17,2002
and April 24, 2002.
From mid-2002 to mid-2003 Trustee technical
staff worked to evaluate and respond to the comments and
to revise their proposal in light of the comments. The
Trustees presented the final proposal in October 2003
and created a password-protected web page to facilitate
Trustee-potentially responsible party (PRP) communications
regarding comments, modifications, or public meeting announcements.
In 2004 and 2005, the Trustees held preliminary
discussions with individual PRPs and initiated settlement
negotiations with others. If the negotiations are ultimately
successful, the Trustees will conclude the damage assessment
process as it relates to the Hylebos Waterway and focus
their attention on the remaining unresolved waterways.
If significant Hylebos Waterway natural resource damage
liability is still unresolved after the negotiations have
concluded, the Trustees will determine what further studies
or other steps are needed to address the outstanding claims.
Public Meetings
The May 17, 2002 meeting was focused on informally
discussing the technical elements of the habitat equivalency
analysis (HEA) model the Trustees used to quantify their
claim for natural resource damages in the Hylebos Waterway
and to present the geographic information system (GIS)
database portion of the HEA and the calculator for the
discounted service acre-years (DSAYs) that are the basis
of the Trustees' claim.
The April 24, 2002 meeting centered on informally
discussing the structure and content of the settlement
proposal and how the Trustees anticipate handling settlement
negotiations.
On October 30, 2003, the Trustees held a question-and-answer
session for potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and counsel
to give interested parties general information to assist
in developing good faith settlement offers in response
to the Trustees' proposal.
The January 23, 2004 meeting between the Trustees, the PRPs and counsel focused on progress toward developing good faith settlement offers and deadlines for submissions of those offers.
Another meeting was held on April 23, 2004 to review the status of the efforts toward developing good faith setttlement offers.
Quarterly public briefings.
NOTE: If you are having any
difficulties with downloading or printing from this site,
please try the following: Use the "Save Target As..."
(Internet Explorer) or "Save Link As..." (Netscape) option
(in toolbar or right-click) to download the PDF file
to your local hard drive and bypass the Acrobat Reader
plug-in. Use the Adobe Acrobat Reader on your hard drive
to open the file for viewing or printing.
Reviewers Guide
to aid reviewers of the allocation elements of the Report.
Two tables (Table
RG-1 and Table
RG-2) were inadvertently omitted from the Guide.
The tables have been incorporated into the document.
Appendix A. Habitat
Equivalency Analysis: An Overview (NOAA
Damage Assessment and Restoration Program, Revised
Oct. 4, 2000)
Appendix B. Discounting
and the Treatment of Uncertainty in Natural Resource
Damage Assessment, Technical Paper 99-1
(NOAA Damage Assessment Center, Feb. 19, 1999)
Appendix C. Determining
Habitat Value and Time to Sustained Function
Appendix D.
Report and Supplements 1 and 2: "Defining Injuries
to Natural Resources in Hylebos Waterway;
Supplement 1 - "Calculating and Separating
the Effects of Multiple Contaminants" Supplement
2 - "Associating Ecosystem Service Loss with
Indicators of Toxicity in Habitat Equivalency Analysis."
Appendix E. How
Habitat and Sediment Injury Information is Mapped
Via a Geographic Information System: Spatial Analysis
of Sediment Chemistry Data
Appendix F. Equating
Contaminant-Related Ecological Service Losses and
Restoration-Generated Service Gains for the Hylebos
Waterway Using Habitat Equivalency Analysis
Appendix G. Determining
Discounted Service Acre-Year (DSAY) Credits for
Example Habitat Restoration Projects
Appendix H. Natural Resource Damage Allocation of Injuries
to Natural Resources in the Hylebos Waterway
Figure 2-2
and Table 3-1
were inadvertently omitted from appendix H.
These have now been incorporated into the document.
Introduction - Hylebos Waterway Natural Resource Damage Assessment Settlement Proposal Review and Comment Process - Revised HEA Results and Liability Allocation
Public Comments Received on the Trustees'
Proposal for Natural Resource Damages Settlement in Hylebos Waterway
[summary table]
Responses to Public Comments on the
Hylebos Waterway Natural Resource Damage Settlement Proposal">PDF
Attachment 1 - ESRI 2002 - Basics
of Geostatistical Analysis, Lesson 2: A synopsis of the interpolators.
Found at Geostats. Accessed on
July 30, 2002. A more recent version of this information can be found
at ESRI
Attachment 4 - Review of
remediation documents by EcoChem, December 12, 2002 ]
Attachment 5 - Map of lograft areas in Hylebos Waterway (before and now)
Attachment 6 - Technical
Memorandum: Findings of Review of PCB and Pesticide Data for the
Hylebos Waterway Project. January 9, 2001
Attachment 7 - EcoChem memorandum on PAH components in various fuels. October 24, 2002
Attachment 8 - Response to
comments relating to the August 2002 Anchor Environmental LLC report on
English sole injuries from PAHs. March 3, 2003
Attachment 9 - Memorandum from
EcoChem regarding comparison of Trustee and HCC data. October 24, 2002
Attachment 10 - Comments from the
NWFSC Laboratory concerning analytical chemistry issues
Attachment 11 - Memorandum on sediment distribution factors in Hylebos Waterway
Attachment 12 - Memorandum from EcoChem regarding sediment chemistry data sets used for the development
of the sediment quality values for Puget Sound. December 31, 2002
Attachment 13 - Copy of slide from presentation by Paul Boehm of Battelle at the NOAA Rapid Assessment Program Training Workshop in Walpole, ME, September 2002
Attachment 14 - Johnson, et al.,
An analysis in support of sediment quality thresholds for polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to protect estuarine fish. Aquatic Conserv: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. (in press - published online in Wiley InterScience -
Wiley InterScience)
Attachments 15, 16 -- not used
Attachment 17 - Technical Memorandum on PAHs and PCB inputs to Hylebos Waterway from Stormwater.
EcoChem Inc. October 30, 2002.
Attachment 18 - Excerpts from a
presentation by Roger Green at the workshop "Establishing Baseline
Conditions for Natural Resource Damage Assessments: Can It Be Done?"
October 2-3, 1996.
Attachment 19 - Technical Memorandum on Tributyltin (TBT) Use In Hylebos Waterway. EcoChem Inc.
October 24, 2002.
Natural
Resource Damage Allocation of Injuries to Natural Resources in the
Hylebos Waterway. March 4, 2003
Appendix 1 - SOC Distribution Maps, Site Boundaries, Parts 1-4
Appendix 5 - Regression Analysis for Applied Distribution Factors
Additional Outreach Materials:
Presentation. Proposed
Settlement for Sediment-Based Injuries to Natural Resources
in Hylebos Waterway, Commencement Bay
Fact Sheet #1. Natural resource agencies and Indian tribes propose
novel approach to resolving environmental damage claims
Fact Sheet #2. Hazardous
chemical contamination in Hylebos Waterway sediments
injures fish that live in and use the area; juvenile
salmon, flatfish, sediment organisms and habitats harmed
by pollution
Fact Sheet #3. Equating natural resource injury losses and habitat
restoration gains - using Habitat Equivalency Analysis
to measure compensatory restoration
Fact Sheet #4. Trustees
propose allocation of natural resource damage liability
among Hylebos Waterway facilities