During Phase 1 of the natural resource
damage assessment (NRDA), the Trustees, potentially
responsible parties, and local environmental organizations
that made up the Commencement Bay NRDA Restoration Panel
developed restoration goals and project evaluation criteria,
and identified and evaluated a series of potential restoration
sites. The Trustees' restoration planning began with
preparation of the Commencement Bay Cumulative Impact
Study (CIS) (May/June 1993), by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers, NOAA, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. That study
analyzed the impact to the Bay’s aquatic resources
resulting mainly from redge-and-fill activities and
identified restoration and mitigation options.
As the CB/NRDA has progressed, the Trustees
have entered into partial or full settlements of claims
with several parties. These settlements have involved
the creation of habitat restoration projects and/or
the providing of funds, property or services for future
construction of projects.
Trustees' Restoration
Vision
Early in the restoration planning process
the Trustees recognized the need to develop a bay-wide
Restoration Vision Statement. The vision pulls together and integrates
the restoration goals and concepts developed to date.
The vision places emphasis on baywide restoration through
an ecosystem or landscape approach rather than creating
isolated fragments of habitats.
Restoration Plan/Environmental
Impact Statement
Under the CB/NRDA process, the Trustees
needed to determine the best approach to restoring,
replacing, rehabilitating, and/or acquiring the equivalent
natural resources and/or services injured as a result
of the release of hazardous substances or a discharge
of oil to the Commencement Bay environment. In order
to guide the restoration planning process, the Trustees,
building on the work of the restoration panel and the
CIS, prepared a Restoration Plan and programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (RP/EIS). After evaluating the alternatives,
the Trustees concluded that the preferred alternative,
the Integrated Approach, best met the needs of the Trustees' restoration goals and principles
by maximizing ecological benefits for a wide range of
natural resources and their associated services.